-
News
- 43 minutes ago
How much have Tottenham spent on transfers under ENIC?
Tottenham Hotspur remain one of the biggest clubs in the Premier League, despite their relatively empty trophy cabinet over recent years.
The north London club ended their long trophy drought with Europa League glory in 2025, but they haven't won the English top flight since 1961, despite a huge amount of money being spent during the 21st century.
Below, we run through how much Tottenham have spent since ENIC became the majority owners of the club in December 2000.
How much have Tottenham spent on transfers under ENIC?
Tottenham have spent a total of €2.1011 billion (€2,101.1 million) on transfers since ENIC took over in 2000.
Tottenham’s first major signing following ENIC's arrival was Christian Ziege from Liverpool, while Gustavo Poyet and Goran Bunjevcevic also joined during the same transfer window.
Spurs aren’t known for spending big on transfers, however, and they had only spent over €100m on new signings in a single season twice before 2017. That happened in the 2008-09 campaign - with Luka Modric and David Bentley among the arrivals - and in 2013-14 following the sale of Gareth Bale.
Their biggest spending season under ENIC came in 2023-24 as Spurs spent a whopping €272.1m on new signings. Brennan Johnson, James Maddison and Micky van de Ven were the most expensive summer arrivals, while Radu Dragusin joined from Genoa in January.
Tottenham's spending under Daniel Levy
| Season | Total Spend |
|---|---|
| 2000-01 (Jan only) | €0m |
| 2001-02 | €15.9m |
| 2002-03 | €0m |
| 2003-04 | €19.3m |
| 2004-05 | €22.6m |
| 2005-06 | €23.7m |
| 2006-07 | €24.3m |
| 2007-08 | €94.2m |
| 2008-09 | €127.6m |
| 2009-10 | €40.3m |
| 2010-11 | €25.9m |
| 2011-12 | €8.5m |
| 2012-13 | €73.3m |
| 2013-14 | €122.6m |
| 2014-15 | €48.5m |
| 2015-16 | €71.4m |
| 2016-17 | €82.4m |
| 2017-18 | €121m |
| 2018-19 | €0m |
| 2019-20 | €130m |
| 2020-21 | €107.5m |
| 2021-22 | €60.9m |
| 2022-23 | €173.1m |
| 2023-24 | €272.1m |
| 2024-25 | €175.4m |
| 2024-25 | €260.6m |
How much have Tottenham earned through sales under ENIC?
Tottenham have earned a total of €1.15135 billion (€1,151.35 million) through player sales since ENIC took over in 2000.
What is Tottenham’s net spend under ENIC?
Tottenham’s net spend under ENIC is €949.8m.
Who are Tottenham’s most expensive signings under ENIC?
Xavi Simons is Tottenham’s most expensive signing under the ENIC ownership. The Dutchman joined the club from RB Leipzig for a fee of €65m in 2025.
Dominic Solanke is second on the list, courtesy of his €64.3m transfer from Bournemouth in 2024.
Tanguy Ndombele is second on the list, courtesy of his €62m transfer from Olympique Lyonnais in 2019.
Mohammed Kudus (€63.8m) is Tottenham's third biggest signing under ENIC, while Tanguy Ndombele (€62M0 and Richarlison (€58m) complete the top five.
| Player | From | Fee |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Xavi Simons | RB Leipzig | €65m |
| 2. Dominic Solanke | Bournemouth | €64.3m |
| 3. Mohammed Kudus | West Ham | €63.8m |
| 4. Tanguy Ndombele | Lyon | €62m |
| 5. Richarlison | Everton | €58m |
Who are Tottenham’s most expensive sales under ENIC?
Gareth Bale is Tottenham’s most expensive sale under ENIC. The Welshman left Spurs to join Real Madrid for a fee of €101m in 2013.
Harry Kane is the second biggest Tottenham sale under ENIC. He joined Bayern Munich for a fee of €95m in 2023.
Kyle Walker (€52.7m) is Tottenham’s third most expensive sale since ENIC joined in 2000, while Brennan Johnson (€40m) and Dimitar Berbatov (€38m) complete the top five.
| Player | To | Fee |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Gareth Bale | Real Madrid | €101m |
| 2. Harry Kane | Bayern Munich | €95m |
| 3. Kyle Walker | Man City | €52.7m |
| 4. Brennan Johnson | Crystal Palace | €40m |
| 5. Dimitar Berbatov | Man Utd | €38m |
The FootballTransfers app
Check out FootballTransfers' new app for all of football's big storylines, transfer rumours and exclusive news in one convenient place directly on your mobile device.
The FootballTransfers app is available in the Apple App Store. Download here: